Property Management
Push rents too hard and units sit empty; play it safe and leave money on the table every month. We find the rent that maximises revenue, not just the rent that fills the unit.
The situation
Property managers face a constant trade-off they rarely quantify: a higher rent earns more per occupied month but risks longer vacancies; a lower rent fills fast but underprices the whole portfolio. Most set rents by matching the building next door and hoping, with no model of how occupancy responds to price.
Vacancy is the silent killer — every empty month is roughly 8% of a unit’s annual income gone — yet there’s no view of the rent level where extra vacancy starts costing more than the higher rent earns.
Where we dig for the truth
We estimate how occupancy responds to rent across the portfolio, then price each unit where total revenue — not just rent — peaks.
Occupancy holds firm up to about $2,000, then falls sharply. Revenue per unit peaks just below that knee — not at the highest rent the manager could ask.
Our approach — Rent-vs-Vacancy Optimization
We model the rent-occupancy curve for each unit type and set rent at the revenue-maximising point, accounting for the real cost of every vacant day. Renewals get small, model-based increases that keep good tenants rather than risking turnover.
Listings, photos and timing then target the units where vacancy costs the most — turning marketing spend toward measurable revenue protection.
Slightly different rents plus shorter vacancies lift net revenue per unit across every type — without a single renovation.
What changes
Same buildings, priced to the curve. Representative for a mid-size residential portfolio.
Frequently asked questions
How do you set the most profitable rent?
Why does vacancy matter so much?
How is this different from matching market rents?
Want this run on your numbers?
Send your rent roll and vacancy history and we’ll find your revenue-maximising rents.