Law Firm
The firm spends heavily on ads and referrals but can’t say which actually produce paying clients. We connect every dollar of spend to closed matters and stop funding what doesn’t.
The situation
A law firm’s marketing is a black box: directories, paid search, referral dinners, a billboard — all running, none measured past the first phone call. Intake counts ‘leads’, but nobody ties a signed, paying matter back to the touchpoints that created it, so budget flows on reputation and habit.
The managing partner suspects half the spend is wasted but can’t prove which half, and high-value matter types get the same undifferentiated marketing as low-value ones.
Where we dig for the truth
We instrument the whole journey — first touch to signed retainer — and attribute each closed matter across the channels that influenced it.
Referrals and organic search quietly drive two-thirds of signed matters; the directories and billboard absorbing real budget barely register.
Our approach — Multi-Touch Marketing Attribution
Multi-touch attribution links spend to signed, paying matters — not just calls — so each channel earns a true cost-per-client and cost-per-fee-dollar. Budget shifts from channels that generate noise to those that generate retainers, and the highest-value matter types get their own targeted campaigns.
A referral program is formalised and measured, turning the firm’s best (and nearly free) channel into a deliberate, trackable engine instead of an accident.
Killing the directory spend and doubling down on referrals and organic roughly halves the blended cost of acquiring a paying client.
What changes
Same firm, spend aimed at what closes. Representative for a small family/immigration practice.
Frequently asked questions
How do you know which marketing actually brings in law clients?
What is multi-touch attribution?
Isn't more advertising the answer?
Want this run on your numbers?
Share your spend and intake data and we’ll show you which channels truly pay.