Architecture / Design Studio
The studio chases every RFP and wins too few, with no idea why. We model what actually predicts a win and stop burning unpaid hours on bids that were never winnable.
The situation
Each proposal costs a design studio real, unbillable time — concepts, fee workups, pitches. Yet most bid on instinct: chasing prestige projects they rarely win and underpricing the work they could. With no read on what predicts a win, the studio’s scarcest asset, senior design time, leaks into losing bids.
Nobody has analysed which project types, client profiles, fee positions and timelines the studio actually converts, so the pipeline is a hopeful scatter and the win rate stays stubbornly low.
Where we dig for the truth
We analyse years of won and lost bids to model the win probability of each opportunity — by project type, client, fee position and fit.
Win rate peaks when the fee sits near 88% of budget — not at the lowest bid. Undercutting wins low-margin work; the model finds the profitable sweet spot.
Our approach — Bid Win-Rate Modelling
A win-probability model scores each new RFP from the attributes that historically predict a win — sector fit, relationship, project type, realistic fee. The studio bids hard where odds and margins are good, qualifies out the unwinnable prestige chases, and prices into the sweet spot instead of racing to the bottom.
Freed senior hours move from losing bids to winnable ones and to billable work, lifting both win rate and utilisation.
Bidding selectively into winnable, well-fit categories nearly doubles the win rate in the studio’s strongest types.
What changes
Same studio, bidding with a model. Representative for a small architecture or design practice.
Frequently asked questions
How do you improve a studio's bid win rate?
What is win-rate modelling?
How is this different from pitching harder?
Want this run on your numbers?
Send your bid history and we’ll model which RFPs are worth your team’s hours.